SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 1016

UMA NATH SINGH, A.N.JINDAL
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Baljinder Singh – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Jindal, J.

1. Baljinder Singh-accused/respondent (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) was challaned under Sections 17 and 18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for keeping in his possession 3 kg. 900 gms of opium, but vide judgment dated 24.11.1997, he was extended benefit of doubt and was acquitted by Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa.

2. Factual matrix of the case is that on 21.2.1994, when Om Parkash Inspector, CIA Staff, Sirsa along with other police officials was present at bus stand of village Sahuwala, he received a secret information against the respondent that he is in the habit of selling opium at his farm house. At this, Om Parkash organised a raiding party and when they were on their way to farm house of the respondent, the respondent was seen coming. He was stopped and after completing formalities, he was taken into custody. On search of the accused 3 kg. 900 gms opium was recovered from a packet carried by him in his hand, out of which a sample of 20 gms was taken out and after putting the same in an iron tin, was converted into a parcel. The remaining opium was also converted into a parc





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top