HEMANT GUPTA
Kirpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Sabharwal – Respondent
Hemant Gupta, J.
1. The grievance of the petitioners is that an interim order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on 7.11.2005 (Annexure P.10) has been violated by the respondents.
2. The respondent-Gram Panchayat has sought the ejectment of the petitioners herein by initiating proceedings under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (regulation) Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). The learned Collector dismissed the petition on 10.4.2002 but the appeal against the aforesaid order was accepted by the learned Director on 8.7.2005. Vide the aforesaid order, the learned Block Development and Panchayat Officer was directed to get demarcated the pond and if it is found that the respondents are in illegal possession, they be removed immediately.
3. In the writ petition against the aforesaid order, this Court stayed the dispossession of the petitioners on 7.11.2005. It is the case of the petitioners that in spite of the order of stay communicated to respondent No. 1, the said respondent started stacking rig for drilling bore, pipes and auxiliary machinery for installing tube well on the land in dispute. The petitioners even approached the police authorities but respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.