SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 944

HEMANT GUPTA
Kirpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Sabharwal – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. The grievance of the petitioners is that an interim order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on 7.11.2005 (Annexure P.10) has been violated by the respondents.

2. The respondent-Gram Panchayat has sought the ejectment of the petitioners herein by initiating proceedings under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (regulation) Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). The learned Collector dismissed the petition on 10.4.2002 but the appeal against the aforesaid order was accepted by the learned Director on 8.7.2005. Vide the aforesaid order, the learned Block Development and Panchayat Officer was directed to get demarcated the pond and if it is found that the respondents are in illegal possession, they be removed immediately.

3. In the writ petition against the aforesaid order, this Court stayed the dispossession of the petitioners on 7.11.2005. It is the case of the petitioners that in spite of the order of stay communicated to respondent No. 1, the said respondent started stacking rig for drilling bore, pipes and auxiliary machinery for installing tube well on the land in dispute. The petitioners even approached the police authorities but respondent







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top