SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 855

PRITAM PAL
Swinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Lal Chand – Respondent


Judgment

Pritam Pal and J JJ.

1. This Civil Revision by petitioners/plaintiffs, filed under article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against order dated march 07,2007,whereby an application for sending Commission to examine one Rattan Kaur, has been dismissed. Suffice it to say that an application for sending commission was moved, when the petitioners were granted last opportunity for adducing their entire evidence. Moreover, the medical record placed on the file does not show, if the witness to be examined on commission, is unable to move. However, a certificate of the doctor from tarn Taran, is placed on the file, wherein rest has been advised to Rattan kaur, stated to be a witness in this case. Counsel for the petitioners is also unable to say as to where the said witness is residing. Taking an over-all view of the facts and circumstances, no interference is called for in the impugned order. Hence, this Civil Revision stands dismissed in limine. However, the trial Court shall give one opportunity to the petitioners/plaintiffs to examine said Rattan Kaur, as a witness if she is brought in Court for her examination.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top