SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 870

T.P.S.MANN
Tarlochan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

T.P.S.Mann, J.

1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the Calendra dated 8.5.2005 under Section 182 IPC initiated against him by Station House Officer, Police Station Division No 3, Ludhiana and all the subsequent proceedings taken in pursuance thereof and pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana.

2. It is stated in the petition that on a written complaint submitted by the petitioner in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana against Ravel Singh and Tejinder Pal Singh, an order was passed by the said Court on 7.4.1999 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. directing the SHO Police Station Division No. 3, Ludhiana to register a case by treating the complaint as an FIR and to investigate the matter. In pursuance thereof, FIR No. 24 dated 8.4.1999 was registered at Police Station Division No. 3, Ludhiana under Section 420 IPC, Sections 78, 79 and 81 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 . However, on the basis of an absolutely baised and defective investigation, the police prepared a cancellation report dated 23.5.1999 and after obtaining final approval from the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana, it was







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top