PRITAM PAL
Mahender – Appellant
Versus
Balbir – Respondent
Pritam Pal and J JJ.
1. This Revision Petition by some of the defendants, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against order dated February 03,2007, whereby appeal filed by the defendants (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners) against order dated February 28, 2006 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bhiwani, granting ad-interim injunction order in favour of Balbir respondent/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the respondents),was dismissed.
2. The only noticeable point of argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that while demarcating the suit land as per report dated July 23,2005, the petitioners were not present and that later on the report given by the Kanungo has also not been considered by the first Appellate Court. In this regard, it is suffice it to say that earlier report dated July 23,2005, was given by Sh. Om Parkash, Tehsildar (Retired), who in his report, had stated that demarcation was done in the presence of the parties/co-sharers. Later report dated March 10,2006, regarding demarcation of the suit land is shown to have been given by one Rajbir Singh, Office Kanungo. None of the aforesaid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.