SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 820

PRITAM PAL
Mahender – Appellant
Versus
Balbir – Respondent


Judgment

Pritam Pal and J JJ.

1. This Revision Petition by some of the defendants, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against order dated February 03,2007, whereby appeal filed by the defendants (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners) against order dated February 28, 2006 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bhiwani, granting ad-interim injunction order in favour of Balbir respondent/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the respondents),was dismissed.

2. The only noticeable point of argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that while demarcating the suit land as per report dated July 23,2005, the petitioners were not present and that later on the report given by the Kanungo has also not been considered by the first Appellate Court. In this regard, it is suffice it to say that earlier report dated July 23,2005, was given by Sh. Om Parkash, Tehsildar (Retired), who in his report, had stated that demarcation was done in the presence of the parties/co-sharers. Later report dated March 10,2006, regarding demarcation of the suit land is shown to have been given by one Rajbir Singh, Office Kanungo. None of the aforesaid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top