VIRENDER SINGH
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
1. The instant revision petition has been filed by the present three petitioners against the impugned order dated 30.10.2000 passed by learned sessions Judge, Sonepat vide which while allowing the application filed by the State under section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, they have been summoned to face trial. Record reveals that while issuing notice of motion to the respondent-State, the proceedings before the trial court were stayed way criminal Revision No.1384 of 2000 -2-back on 20.11.2000. Brief facts:
2. At the instance of complainant Dharminder, the real brother of sumitra Devi (since deceased), case FIR No.13 dated 25.10.1999, under sections 498-A, 304-B, 201 IPC was registered against the petitioners, maha Singh husband of petitioner no.1 and Bhupinder the husband of deceased alleging that after solemnisation of the marriage with Bhupinder on 1.5.1993, the family members of her in-laws had started making demands. Sumitra Devi ultimately died an un-natural death on 22.10.1999. The allegation was that in fact she was killed and without informing the parents, her dead body was cremated. The police after registering the case under sections 304-B, 498-A, 201 IPC
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi V/s. Ram Kishan Rohtagi And Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.