SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 762

HEMANT GUPTA
Jagat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jeet Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 29-12-1992 in respect of the land measuring 5 kanals 2 marlas was decreed.

2. It is the case of the plaintiff that on the aforesaid date, defendant No. 1 agreed to sell the land in the sum of Rs. 26,500/-. The entire amount was paid to the said defendant. It was agreed that the sale deed will be executed subsequently. Earlier, the plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction on 4-6-1994 restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit land. Subsequently, the present suit for specific performance was filed on the ground that the defendant No. 1 has sold the land in dispute to defendant No. 2 i.e. the present appellant on 23-5-1994.

3. Both the Courts have returned concurrent finding of fact that the agreement of sale dated 29-12-1992 Exhibit P1 stands proved from the testimony of PW2 Prithi Singh, Charan Singh PW4 and Rameshwar PW6, the attesting witnesses. The said attesting witnesses have deposed that the possession of the land was delivered to the plaintiff. Still further, both the Cou






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top