SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 457

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.M.Kumar and Rajesh Bindal JJ.
Commissioner Of Customs
Versus
Leader Valves Ltd.
CUSAP No. 15 of 2006,
Decided On : MARCH 15, 2007

Purchaser of DEPB not involved in fraud cannot be deprived of legitimate benefits; duty recovery not valid without misrepresentation, collusion, or suppression of facts.

Headnote:

Customs Act - DEPB Scheme - Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992 - [Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992] - The judgment discusses the DEPB scheme under the Import and Export Policy, the cancellation of DEPB due to fraudulent activities, and the liability of the purchaser of the DEPB. The court considered the legal provisions related to duty exemption, realisation of export proceeds, and the consequences of fraudulent documents in the context of the Customs Act and the Foreign Trade Act, and concluded that the purchaser could not be deprived of the benefits legitimately available to them.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee-respondent purchased a Duty Entitlement Pass-Book (DEPB) from M/s. Parker Industries, which was later found to be obtained fraudulently. The revenue sought to recover duty from the assessee-respondent under the Customs Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the assessee-respondent was not involved in the fraud and had purchased the DEPB in good faith. It held that the assessee-respondent could not be deprived of the benefits legitimately available to them and that the revenue's claim for duty recovery was not valid.

Issues: Fraudulent acquisition of DEPB, liability of the purchaser for duty payment, and the validity of duty recovery under the Customs Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The purchaser of the DEPB, who was not involved in the fraud, could not be deprived of the benefits legitimately available to them. The revenue's claim for duty recovery was not valid due to the expiration of the statutory period and the absence of misrepresentation, collusion, or suppression of facts by the purchaser.

Final Decision: All three appeals by the revenue were dismissed, and the court held that the purchaser could not be deprived of the benefits legitimately available to them.

Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. The revenue has filed three appeals namely CUSAP Nos. 14 , 15 and 17 of 2006 under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act , 1962 (for brevity #24;the Customs Act#25;) by challenging the order dated 5-5-2005 , 1-6-2005 and 27-4-2004 respectively passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for brevity the Tribunal). As common question of facts and law have been raised in all these appeals we decide them by a common order. The revenue has assailed the order passed by the Tribunal on the principal ground that once the Joint Director (General) of Foreign Trade had cancelled the Duty Exemption Pass Book which is commonly known as DEPB Scheme issued to M/s. Parker Industries 184 , Dilbagh Nagar , Jalandhar which order was upheld in appeal by the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade then the assessee- respondent who had purchased the DPEB from M/s. Parker Industries were not entitled to avail any benefit. For the sake of convenience , the facts are being referred from CUSAP No. 15 of 2006.

2. The Government of India in order to boost export had announced various concessions including exemption from payment of Central Excise duty , Customs duty and formulation of various schemes under the Import and Export Policy , known as EXIM Policy , which is formulated under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992 (for brevity #24;the Act#25;). DEPB is one of those schemes framed-under the EXIM policy which is in the nature of a licence to import material without payment of Customs duty and is in the form a pass-book. The pass book is issued against exports and fixed percentage of value of exports made is credited in the DEPB pass- book which is accounted for against the imports. According to the procedure an application for obtaining DEPB is made to the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade on a prescribed form accompanied by a bank certificate of exports and realisation of export proceedings in addition to other documents. The application for obtaining DEPB can be made even before realisation of export proceedings if the export proceedings are not realised within a period of six months or within the extended period then the DEPB holder is liable to pay an amount equal to DEPB availed along with interest at the rate of 24 per cent from the date of issue of DEPB till the date of deposit. It is further appropriate to mention that DEPB has been made saleable and the purchaser can avail the same benefits which could have been availed by the original exporter. The Duty Entitlement Pass-Book(s) Scheme reads as under :

#28;...Under this scheme the exporter is given duty entitlement at notified rates , which enable him to import inputs required for export production duty-free. He can also make use of this credit to import freely importable goods and or such credit can be transferred. The DEPB scrip is transferable scrip and it is regularly traded in the market. (d) That the main features of the DEPB scheme as operated under the Export Import Policy are the following :-

(i) Duty exemption under the scheme is available against export of goods. (ii) The exemption is to be availed by debiting credits , which is to be earned at the specific rate notified by DGFT for the relevant product which is exported. (iii) The DEPB credit is subject to realisation of export proceeds. If the export proceeds are not realised within six months or such extended period as allowed by R.B.I. , the D.E.P.B. Holder has to pay cash equivalent to the credit amount.#29;

3 The assessee-respondent No. 1 i.e. M/s. Leaders Valves Ltd. was a beneficiary of DEPB scrip No. P/L 3053128, dated 2-1-1998 which was transferred to it by M/s. Parker Industries Jalandhar. The later had obtained the afore-mentioned DEPB scrip fraudulently by forging Bank Certificate of Export Realisation (for brevity #24;the BCER#25;) purported to have been issued by Punjab and Sind Bank , Mota Singh Nagar , Jalandhar.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top