SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2676

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
K.S.Garewal and R.S.Madan JJ.
Sukhdev Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Criminal Appeal No. 611 of 2001,526 of 2001,
Decided On : JULY 11, 2006

The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove conscious possession of contraband and the necessity of framing alternative charges under relevant sections of the NDPS Act.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 15 - Section 15 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and also referred to Sections 35 and 54 of the same Act. The court highlighted the importance of proving conscious possession of contraband and the presumption from possession of illicit articles under Section 54. The judgment also referenced the interpretation of 'possession' and 'conscious possession' as well as the requirement for the accused to be given an opportunity to rebut the presumption as envisaged in Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were found in possession of poppy husk, and the prosecution relied on evidence to prove their guilt. The accused claimed innocence and argued that the case was planted upon them. The trial court convicted and sentenced the accused, leading to the appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of the contraband by the accused, and no alternative charge under Section 8 of the NDPS Act for transporting the offensive goods was framed. The court held that the prosecution had miserably failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond any shadow of doubt.

Issues: The issues included the failure to prove conscious possession of the contraband, the absence of an alternative charge under Section 8 of the NDPS Act, and the lack of identification marks on the case property produced in court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of proving conscious possession of contraband and the requirement for the accused to be given an opportunity to rebut the presumption as envisaged in Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court also highlighted the necessity of framing alternative charges under relevant sections of the NDPS Act.

Final Decision: The appeal was accepted, and the accused were acquitted of the charge framed against them. The order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused was set aside, and they were discharged from the bail bonds if furnished.

Judgment

R.S.Madan, J.

1. By this order, we propose to dispose of two Criminal Appeals bearing No. 611 and 526-DB of 2001, vide which the appellants have been convicted by Shri Baldev Singh, Special Judge, Faridkot, vide order dated 11.9.2001 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for twelve years and to pay a fine of Rs. One lakh. In default of payment of fine they were further ordered to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two years, under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (for short hereinafter referred to as the "NDPS Act").

2. In brief, the facts of the prosecution case which are taken out from the judgment of the trial Court are reproduced as under :-

that on 23.4.1984 DSP Narinderpal Singh along with Inspector Jagmohan Singh, ASI Mohan Lal, ASI Dilbagh Singh, ASI Jagdish Rai, HC Surajpal Singh, ASI Ajmer Singh and other police officials was going from Village Kokri Kalan towards Village Jalalabad in connection with the search of terrorists on Govt. vehicle and when the police party reached in the area of Village Kokri Kalan crossing, one truck was seen coming from the side of Jalalabad. DSP Narinderpal Singh and other police officials had taken the positions after alighting from the vehicle. DSP Narinderpal Singh stopped the truck with the help of torch light and they encircled the truck. Balbir Singh accused was driving the truck and accused Kirpal Singh was sitting by his side and Sukhdev Singh accused was sitting on the back of the truck. From the search of the truck, 125 bags of poppy husk were recovered. They were numbered from 1 to 125. 250 grams of poppy husk was separated as sample from each bag and the remaining on weighment came to be 39.750 kgs. of poppy husk each. The remaining poppy husk was allowed to remain in the same bags. All the samples were converted into parcels. Each bag and the samples were sealed by the DSP Narinderpal Singh with his seal bearing letters "NPS" and the seal after use was handed over to Inspector Jagmohan Singh. All the sample parcels and the bags were taken into possession vide memo Ex. PD attested by Inspector Jagmohan Singh and Ajmer Singh ASI. From the personal search of the accused Sukhdev Singh, currency notes of Rs. 20/- were recovered which were taken into possession vide memo Ex. PG/1 attested by the abovesaid witnesses. From the personal search of Kirpal Singh noting was recovered and memo Ex. PG/2 was prepared which was thumb marked by the accused and attested by the witnesses. From personal search of Balbir Singh accused, currency notes of Rs. 15/- were recovered which were taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex. PG/3 attested by the abovesaid PWs and thumb marked by the accused. Truck bearing No. PJI-4475 was taken into possession along with the documents vide memo Ex. PG/4 attested by the abovesaid PWs. Grounds of arrest were disclosed to the accused vide separate memos Ex. PE, Ex. PF and Ex. PG thumb marked/signed by the accused. Ruqa Ex. PH was sent to the police station for the registration of the case, on the basis of which formal FIR Ex. PH/1 was recorded by Baldev Singh MHC. DSP Narinderpal Singh prepared the rough site plan Ex. PJ at the spot and recorded the statements of the witnesses under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thereafter, the Deputy Superintendent of Police entrusted the investigation of the case to Inspector Jagmohan Singh. On return to the Police Station, the accused were lodged in the police lockup. On the same day, Inspector Jagmohan Singh produced the accused and the case property before Shri K.K. Kareer, JHMIC, Moga and on return to the police station the case property was deposited with the MHC. The samples in due course were sent to the Chemical Examiner. After the receipt of the report of the Chemical Examiner Ex. PK and completion of necessary investigation into the case, the accused were challaned.

3. On appearance of the accused before the learned Special Judge, a prima f






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top