SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2395

VIRENDER SINGH
Karnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
Paramjit Singh : State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Virender Singh, J.

1. Vide this judgment, I am disposing of the aforesaid two appeals as they are arising out of one and the same FIR No. 66 dated 18-9-1992 registered at Police Station Amargarh under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short `the Act).

2. It is worth mentioning here that appellant Paramjit Singh was declared as a proclaimed offender during the trial. He was subsequently apprehended. His case was segregated from his co- accused. He now stands convicted in a supplementary session case vide impugned judgment of learned Judge, Special Court, Sangrur, dated 16.4.2001, whereas aforesaid two appellants, namely, Karnail Singh and Labh Singh stand convicted vide impugned judgment of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur dated 6.10.2000.

3. It is pertinent to mention here that one Piara Singh son of Jagat Singh (Conductor), resident of village Balno also stands convicted alongwith aforesaid Labh Singh and Karnail Singh @ Kaila. As per the information received from the concerned criminal branch, he has not preferred any appeal against his conviction till today. Mr. Hoshiarpuri has also confirmed this fact from the concerne
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top