SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2397

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Virender Singh, J.
Noor Aga
Versus
State Of Punjab
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 810SB of 2000,
Decided On : JUNE 9, 2006

Contraband - Safe Custody of case property - Incharge of the team stationed at the AIRPORT is the person who has to keep the case property in his safe custody for all intents & purpose.

Headnote:Confessional Statement - Statement recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act is not hit by section 25 of the Evidence Act and can alone be made basis for conviction, if it is worthy of credence.

       Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 22, 23 - Contraband Substances - Recovery of 1 kg 400 grams of heroin - Appeal against conviction - Appellant an Afghan national, landed at Raja Sansi Airport - On suspicion, search was conducted in the presence of Gazetted Officer - 22 packets of heroin were recovered from the carton carried by her - Appellant suffered confessional statement u/s 10, of the Custom Act which was found to be made voluntarily - Element of possession and control of the contraband qua the appellant proved - Conviction maintained. (Para 35, 37, 40, 44)

       Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 55 - Contraband - Safe Custody of case property - Incharge of the team stationed at the AIRPORT is the person who has to keep the case property in his safe custody for all intents and purpose. (Para 52)

       Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Object and Reasons - Contraband - Recovery of - Onus to prove - Harder is the punishment, more is the onus on the prosecution to lead satisfactory evidence to clear all reasonable doubts from the mind of the court before asking for the conviction. (Para 15)

       Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 35, 34 - Conscious possession - Presumption of culpable possession - Presumption of culpable mental state - Element of Possession and control over it - Recovery from carton carried by her - Appellant was a member of Crew party - What was being carried in the carton was within the knowledge of the appellant alone - Element of possession and control over the contraband qua the appellant is writ large - Presumption of culpable mental state has to be drawn against the appellant. (Para 40)

       Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 25 - Confessional statement - Statement recorded under section 108 of the customs Act is not hit by section 25 of the Evidence Act and can alone be made basis for conviction, if it is worthy of credence (Para 44)

       Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 50 - Contraband - Recovery of - Search of a person - Discrepancies in statement - Document shows that it was prepared after the search was conducted - PW 2 (Gazetted Officer) stated that an option was given to the accused for his search and disclosed himself to be a Gazetted Officer - Cannot be said to be a vital flaw in the case. (Para 37)

       

Judgment

1. Appellant Noor Aga i s an Afghan national. Vide impugned judgment of learned Special Judge, Amritsar dated 7.6.2000, he stands convicted under sections 22 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Pychotropic Substances Act, 185 (for short the act) for allegedlyfound in conscious possession of 1 kg 400 grams heroin (net w t in22 pakets) on 1.8.1997 when intercepted by the Custfedfdfdfdsffdoms officials at raja Sansi Airport, Amritsar. In fact the appellant was one of the crew members of Ariana Afghan Air Lines. He has now been sentenced to undergo RI for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs 1 lac under section 22 of the Act, in default thereof to further undergo RI for three years; for the same period on both the counts under section 23 of the Act also including the sentence for default clause. However, both the sentences are ordered to run concurrently. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence, he has preferred the instant appeal. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the prosecution is that on 1.8.1997, at about 6 PM, Ariana Afghan Air Lines landed at Raja sansi Airport. The appellant presented himself for custom clearance along with luggage being carried by him which included one carton containing grapes. The said carton had two layers. This created suspicion in the mind of PW1 Inspector Kulwant Singh of Customs house. He asked the appellant as to whether he was carrying any contraband or any other suspicious item to which he replied in negative.

2. However, Kulwant Singh PW asked him as to whether he wanted to get his search conducted in the presence of a Magistrate or a Gazetted officer of the Customs Department. Through his option Ex. PA in writing, he intended his search to be conducted before Gazetted Officer of the Customs Department. Thereafter K. K. Gupta, Superintendent of customs Department (PW2) and two independent witnesses Mohinder singh and Yusaf were called. The consent memo was attested by aforesaid K. K. Gupta and Inspector Kulwant Singh. K. K. Gupta also disclosed his identity to the appellant as of Gazetted Officer of Customs department. The carton was checked in which layers of the walls were separated from other layers.22 packets of polythene containing white powder were recovered. The material was tested with the drug testing kit already with the Customs officials and found it to be heroin. The total gross weight of the heroin was 1460 grams whereas the net weight was 1440 grams. Three homogeneous representative samples from each bags in small quantity were taken. They were of 5 grams each. Sample and the remaining bulk were sealed with the seal bearing No.122 of the customs Division. The empty card Board carton in which the heroin was concealed was also sealed with the seal bearing No.122 of the Customs division. The remainder of heroin was taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex. PB. It was signed by the appellant and attested by aforesaid independent witnesses, namely Mohinder Singh and Yusaf. A panchnama Ex. PC was also prepared by Inspector Kulwant Singh and it was signed by the appellant. It was also signed by the aforesaid mohinder Singh and Yusaf. Jamatalashi Ex. PE was also prepared which was signed by him. Sample seal was also prepared at the spot. The sample and the bulk were kept with the Assistant Inspector Customs, Raja Sansi.

3. On 2.8.1997, the appellant made a voluntary statement Ex. PF in his own hand and signed each page. It was also signed by aforesaid K. K. Gupta, Superintendent Customs. On 4.8.1997, the appellant made another voluntary statement Ex. PG in question answer form written by Inspector Kulwant Singh. That too was signed by the appellant. A certificate Ex. PG/1 was also given by the appellant to the effect that on his request and dictation, the aforesaid statement was written by Inspector Kulwant Singh.

4. The appellant along with remaining bulk and sample was produced before the learned Duty Magistrate, Amritsar. The samples were sent to the Central Reven


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top