SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2364

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, P.S.PATWALIA
Dalbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

J. S. Khehar, J.

1. Having examined the issue in its totality, based on the pleadings of the instant writ petition, we are of the view, that the controversy raised by the petitioners would need an adjudication on facts. Realising the aforesaid predicament, learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the petitioners will be satisfied, if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 i. e. the District Education officer (Elementary Education), Gurdaspur, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice issued by the petitioners on 22.2.2006 (Annexure P-14 ). Notice of motion. On our asking, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate cwp No.8793 of 2006 Page numbers General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.4 i. e. the District educ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top