SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2307

M.M.KUMAR
Hakam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baljit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, the Code), is directed against the order dated 3.8.1994, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur, allowing the application of the plaintiff-respondents seeking an amendment in the plaint at the stage of appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code, which is pending consideration of the learned lower appellate Court.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-respondents had filed a suit for joint possession, declaration and permanent injunction by challenging two sale deeds dated 6.3.1990 executed by their rather Gurdev Singh in favour of the defendant-petitioners. The defendant-petitioners are the nephews of Gurdev Singh, who is father of the plaintiff-respondents. One of the sale deeds was executed in favour of defendant-petitioners Nos. l to 4 and the other sale deed has been executed in favour of defendant-petitioner Nos. 5 and 6. A specific plea had been taken that the property is ancestral in nature as is evident from the pleadings in paras 3, 4 and 5 of the plaint which reads as under:

3. That previously Jangir Singh deceased was the owner of











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top