SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2266

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Kedar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Petitioner Kedar Nath (accused), who presently is confined in Central Jail, Ambala, has filed this criminal revision against the order dated 8.4.2006, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, whereby on an application for suspension of sentence filed by the petitioner along with the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a condition was imposed i.e., to deposit an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- before the trial Court at the tune of furnishing his bail bonds.

2. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court as well as the impugned order passed by the Appellate Court.

3. In this case, the petitioner was convicted for the offence Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for dishonour of several cheques amounting to Rs. 1,50,000/- vide judgment of conviction dated 27.3.2006 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagadhri. Subsequently, on the next day, i.e., 28.3.2006, the petitioner was senten











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top