SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Kedar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.
1. Petitioner Kedar Nath (accused), who presently is confined in Central Jail, Ambala, has filed this criminal revision against the order dated 8.4.2006, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, whereby on an application for suspension of sentence filed by the petitioner along with the appeal filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a condition was imposed i.e., to deposit an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- before the trial Court at the tune of furnishing his bail bonds.
2. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court as well as the impugned order passed by the Appellate Court.
3. In this case, the petitioner was convicted for the offence Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for dishonour of several cheques amounting to Rs. 1,50,000/- vide judgment of conviction dated 27.3.2006 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagadhri. Subsequently, on the next day, i.e., 28.3.2006, the petitioner was senten
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.