SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 2185

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
J.S.Khehar and P.S.Patwalia JJ.
Manju Bala
Versus
State Of Haryana
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 19894 of 2005,
Decided On : MAY 17, 2006

The court emphasized the legality and rationality of the criteria adopted by the State Government for shortlisting candidates for interview in the recruitment process for the selection of Lecturers.

Headnote:

Shortlisting - Recruitment - Criteria for Selection of Lecturers - [Academic Record, Good Academic Record, Higher Qualifications, Teaching Experience, Co-curricular Activities, Interview] - [No written test will be organized for filling up these posts UGC instructions and relevant Service Rules will be followed in the recruitment process. NET in the relevant subject is compulsory for the post of Lecturer (College Cadre) as per Service Rules and UGC guidelines.] - The court upheld the shortlisting criteria for the selection of Lecturers, emphasizing the legality and rationality of the criteria adopted by the State Government. The court found no legal infirmity in the shortlisting process and dismissed the writ petitions.

Fact of the Case:

The State of Haryana invited applications for filling up temporary posts of Lecturers. The petitioners, fulfilling the minimum eligibility qualifications, were not called for interview. They filed writ petitions seeking direction to be interviewed for the advertised posts.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the shortlisting criteria for the selection of Lecturers, emphasizing the legality and rationality of the criteria adopted by the State Government. The court found no legal infirmity in the shortlisting process and dismissed the writ petitions.

Issues: The legality and rationality of the shortlisting criteria for the selection of Lecturers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no legal infirmity in the shortlisting process and upheld the criteria adopted by the State Government for shortlisting candidates for interview.

Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed, and the interim orders granted to the petitioners were vacated. No costs were awarded to the petitioners.

Judgment

P. S. PATWALIA, J.

1. This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.19894, 19754, 19128, 19362, 19728, 19638, 19866, 19537, 19641, 19846, 19535, 19542, 19724, 19878, 19930, 20084, 20169, 20212, 20431 of 2005, 33, 41, 100, 186, 236, 268, 1288 and 2116 of 2006. The factual matrix leading to the filing of these writ petitions is as under:-

The State of Haryana vide advertisement No.1 of 2005 published on 16.7.2005 invited applications for filling up 381 temporary posts of Lecturers in the School Cadre in the Department of Education by way of direct recruitment. All the petitioners in this bunch of writ petitions submitted their applications in response to the advertisement for being considered for appointment to these posts. Interviews to consider the claims of various candidates against the advertised posts commenced in December, 2005. Inspite of the fact that the petitioners were fulfilling the minimum eligibility qualifications for being considered for appointment, they were not called for interview. It is at that stage that these writ petitions were filed with a prayer that the respondent-State of Haryana should be directed to interview the petitioners and to consider them for selection against the posts of Lecturers which have been advertised. Notice of motion was issued in these writ petitions and it was ordered that in the meanwhile, the petitioners may be interviewed provisionally, subject to the outcome of the writ petitions. It was also ordered that the result would not be declared till further orders.

2 In response to the notice issued a written statement has been filed by the Under Secretary, Higher Education, Haryana on behalf of the State government. In the reply it is disclosed that against 381 posts of Lecturers which were advertised 2806 applications were received. The selection was to be made on the basis of academic record and interview alone, without there being any written test. Since the number of applications received were many times the number of posts advertised the State Government took a decision to short list the candidates to be called for interview and it was decided to call three times the number of candidates than the posts advertised. For this purpose the State Government had formulated a criteria which was disclosed to the Court at the time of arguments. A copy of the same was also supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. The criteria is as under:-

" CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF LECTURERS (COLLEGE CADRE)I Academic Record (See Point No. I in Note) Masters level Degree 40 maximum marks i) Marks obtained upto 55% being minimum Nil ii) Beyond 55% one number for every additional percentage (See point No. V in Notes)II Good Academic Record 10 maximum marks i) Ist Division in all three lower examinations i. e. BA final, Prep. Or +2 and Matric prior to ma/m. Sc. /m. Com 10 ii)` Ist Division in two lower examinations i. e. BA Final, prep. Or +2 and Matric prior to MA/m. Sc. /m. Com.5 iii) Ist Division in one lower examinations i. e. A Final, prep. Or +2 and Matric prior to MA/m. Sc. /m. Com 2 iii Weightage for additional/higher Qualifications (See point No. IV in notes)10 maximum marks i) Ph. D 10 ii) M. Phil 5 iv Teaching Experience (See point No. III in Notes) 05 maximum marks v Co-curricular Activities (See point No. II in notes) 10 maximum marks i) University Yough Festival (Only if attained Prize-not participation alone) 1 ii) Debates (if attained position in inter college debates 2 iii) NCC 02 maximum marks a) C Certificate 2 b) B Certificate 1 iv) NSS (Camp of 10 days atleast) 01 maximum marks v) Sports (Only Open Championships) (International) 04 maximum marks a) Position 4 b) Participation 3 (National)a) Position 3 b) Participation 2 (State)a) Position 1 vi Interview 25 grand TOTAL 100

NOTES:-

i) No written test will be organized for filling up these posts UGC instructions and relevant Service Rules will be followed in the recruitment process. NET in the relevant s

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top