PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Mehtab S.Gill and T.P.S.Mann JJ.
Karam Singh
Versus
State Of Haryana
Criminal Appeal No. 524 of 2003,
Decided On : MAY 16, 2006
Criminal Appeal - Murder - Sections 302, 307, 324, 323 read with Sections 149 and 148 IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of three individuals and causing injuries to several others. The incident arose from a longstanding grudge between the accused and the complainant party. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and attacked the complainant party, resulting in the deaths and injuries.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the common object of the unlawful assembly was to cause grievous hurt, not murder. Only one appellant, Karam Singh, exceeded the common object by resorting to firing, resulting in the deaths. The remaining appellants were held guilty for causing injuries but not for murder.
Issues: The key issues included the establishment of the common object of the unlawful assembly, the motive behind the attack, and the individual actions of the appellants during the incident.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of Section 149 IPC to determine the liability of the appellants for the actions of the unlawful assembly. It emphasized the need for a nexus between the common object and the offence committed by any member of the assembly.
Final Decision: Karam Singh was held guilty under Section 302 IPC for the murders, while the remaining appellants were held guilty under Sections 326/149, 324/149, 323/149, and 148 IPC. The sentences were maintained and ordered to run concurrently.
1. By this common judgment, we are disposing of Criminal Appeal No. 524-DB of 2003 filed by Karam Singh and nine others and Criminal Appeal No. 727-DB of 2003 filed by Prem Singh and two others, whereby they have challenged the judgment dated 26.5.2003 and order dated 28.5.2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala while convicting and sentencing them.
2. The aforementioned thirteen appellants along with one Nirmal Singh were initially arraigned as accused on the allegations that on 1.12.1995 they committed the murder of Bhim Singh, Ram Partap and Kusum, besides giving injuries to Rajpal, Udham Singh, Satish Kumar, Nasib Singh and Angrej Singh. Before the case was taken up for consideration on the question of charge, Nirmal Singh accused died. Charge were framed against the present 13 appellants under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323 read with Sections 149 and 148 IPC. Charge under Section 27 of the Arms Act was also framed against Karam Singh appellant.
3. After the conclusion of the trial, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala convicted Karam Singh-appellant under Section 302 IPC and the remaining appellants under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each. In default of payment of fine, the defaulting accused was directed to undergo further RI for 3 months. Karam Singh-appellant was also convicted under Section 326 IPC and the remaining appellants under Sections 326 read with Section 149 IPC in respect of injuries of Raj Pal PW-10 and sentence of RI for five years and a fine of Rs. 300/- was imposed upon each of the 13 appellants. In default of payment of fine, the defaulting accused was directed to undergo further RI for two months. All the 13 appellants were also convicted under Sections 324 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and 148 IPC for which they were sentenced to undergo RI for one year each, RI for 6 months each and RI for 2 years each respectively. For the charge under Section 27 of the Arms Act, Karam Singh-appellant was held guilty and sentenced to undergo RI for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/-. In default of payment of fine, he was directed to undergo further RI for 2 months. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
4. The facts giving rise to the present case are that on 1.12.1995 at 7.00 A.M., Bhim Singh, Raj Pal, Udham Singh and Angrej Singh were proceeding on a tractor-trolley towards their fields. They were taking manure in the trolley. Bhim Singh was driving the tractor. All the appellants along with Nirmal Singh-accused were found present on their way. While Karam Singh was standing with a gun in his hands, the other accused were having gandasis and lathis in their hands. On seeing the tractor-trolley, the accused raised a Lalkara while abusing and proclaimed that it was an appropriate chance to catch them, referring to the persons, who were proceeding on the tractor-trolley to the fields. Saying so, Karam Singh opened fire with the gun, which hit Bhim Singh on his neck. On hearing the noise of the fire shot, Hakam Singh, Ram Partap, Angrej Singh, Jaswant Singh, Satish Kumar, Nasib Singh and Kusum, daughter of Balbir, arrived at the spot. All of them started rescuing Bhim Singh etc. from Prem Singh and others. In the meantime, Karam Singh accused fired many shots from his gun, which hit Bhim Singh, Ram Partap, Raj Pal, Udham Singh and Kusam. As a result of the firing, Bhim Singh and Ram Partap succumbed to their injuries at the spot. Prem Singh etc., who were having lathis and gandasis in their hands, gave injuries to Angrej Singh, Nasib Singh, Jaswant Singh and Satish Kumar, who were, thereafter, sent to Civil Hospital, Naraingarh for treatment. The persons of the complainant side, also inflicted injuries to Prem Singh and Ramji Lal in their defence. Accused Karam Singh and others were also saying that Jagdish and Ishwar should also be brought out as they w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.