M.M.KUMAR, M.M.S.BEDI
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
M.M.Kumar, J.
1. The prayer made by the petitioners is for issuance of a writ in She nature of certiorari for quashing the condition restricting their tenure to a period of three years by the appointment letter dated 8.6.2003 (Annexure P.2). It is appropriate to mention that respondent No. 1 issued an advertisement through Haryana Public Service Commission being advertisement No. 8 for filling up the tenure posts of Senior Resident and Demonstrator, Class I! for a fixed, period of three years at PGIMS (Denial College), Rohtak. The petitioners were selected and appointed for a period of three years and accordingly appointment letter was issued on 8.6.2003 (Annexure P.2). In the appointment letter Clause 2 specifically provided as under:
This post is for a tenure of three years only subject to your medical fitness and in anticipation of verification of your character antecedents (to be got verified afterwards).
2. It is further pointed out that in 2004 again the tenure posts were advertised in the same manner and some candidates were selected and appointed who joined in July, 2004. A similar condition for three years tenure has been incorporated in their letters of appointmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.