SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1977

M.M.KUMAR, M.M.S.BEDI
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. The prayer made by the petitioners is for issuance of a writ in She nature of certiorari for quashing the condition restricting their tenure to a period of three years by the appointment letter dated 8.6.2003 (Annexure P.2). It is appropriate to mention that respondent No. 1 issued an advertisement through Haryana Public Service Commission being advertisement No. 8 for filling up the tenure posts of Senior Resident and Demonstrator, Class I! for a fixed, period of three years at PGIMS (Denial College), Rohtak. The petitioners were selected and appointed for a period of three years and accordingly appointment letter was issued on 8.6.2003 (Annexure P.2). In the appointment letter Clause 2 specifically provided as under:

This post is for a tenure of three years only subject to your medical fitness and in anticipation of verification of your character antecedents (to be got verified afterwards).

2. It is further pointed out that in 2004 again the tenure posts were advertised in the same manner and some candidates were selected and appointed who joined in July, 2004. A similar condition for three years tenure has been incorporated in their letters of appointmen





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top