SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1942

T.P.S.MANN
Jinda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

T.P.S.Mann, J.

1. The petitioner herein seeks the advantage of period of parole towards the actual sentence undergone by him. He remained in custody as an under-trial for 1 year and 3 months. On 17.1.1996, when he was sentenced to undergo the imprisonment for 10 years, he was further remanded to judicial custody. Uptil 20.4.2006, he served a total period of 7 years 9 months and 11 days in jail including the under-trial period of 1 year and 3 months. The petitioner also earned remission for a period of 2 years 6 months and 22 days making it a period of 10 years 4 months and 3 days. During his stay in jail as a convict, he availed of parole on a number of occasions and the total period for which he was released on parole was 6 months and 16 days. After deducting the parole period, the actual sentence undergone by the petitioner, thus, came to be 9 years 9 months and 17 days uptil 20.4.2006.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, if the parole period is not excluded from the total sentence undergone by him, he has completed the requisite sentence of 10 years imprisonment and deserves to be released from custody forthwith. However, according to the petitioner,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top