ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, RAJESH BINDAL
Bharti Engg. Corpn. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
1. The petitioner has approached this Court by making the following substantive prayers:
(i) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order/letter dt. 12th Jan., 2006 (Annex. P-13) passed by respondent No. 3;
(ii) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to allow the claim for the refund of Rs. 5,61,380 along with interest for the asst. yr. 1989-90;
2. The petitioner, which is a partnership firm carrying on the business of manufacturing and sale of diesel engines and spares, filed its return of income, for the asst. yr. 1989-90 declaring net assessable income at Rs. 4,55,289. Not satisfied with the return filed by the petitioner, the AO issued notices to the petitioner under Sections 143(2)/142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short the Act) and vide assessment order dt. 31st March, 1992 assessed the income of the petitioner at Rs. 17,45,390. Aggrieved against the assessment order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the CIT(A), who vide order dt. 10th Nov., 1995 accepted the appeal of the petitioner and restored the matter back to AO to redetermine the liability of the petitioner after affording reasonable opportunity
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.