S.S.Saron, J.

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has produced the dasti notices regarding effecting of service on respondent No. 1. According to the same, respondent No. 1 has been served. However, despite service, no one has put in appearance on his behalf. He is, therefore, proceeded against ex parte.

2. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 9.12.2004 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Sangrur, whereby defendants-respondents No. 2 to 4 have been granted permission to lead secondary evidence of an agreement to sell dated 13.6.1995.

3. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of the agreements to sell dated 20.6.1996, 15.11.1996 and 31.12.1996 executed by Inderjit Singh (defendant No. 1) in favour of the plaintiff with regard to land measuring 12 Bighas 13 Biswas, as detailed in the head note of the plaint, after setting aside the sale deeds dated 18.12.1996 executed by Inderjit Singh (defendant No. 1) in favour of Amarjit Singh (defendant No. 4) and Kulwinder Kaur (defendant No. 2) as also the sale deed dated 20.5.1997 executed by Inderjit Singh (defendant No. 1) in favour of Kulwinder Kaur and Tejin