SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1520

S.S.SARON
Narinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Daler Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

S. S. Saron, J.

1. The case of the plaintiff-petitioner is that agreement dated 15.2.1999 was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent in terms of which the defendant-respondent agreed to sell the suit land measuring 44 Kanals 9 Marlas for a consideration of Rs.6 Lacs. Rs.50,000/-is stated to have been paid as earnest money to the respondent. The sale deed was to be executed on 29.10.1999 after receipt of balance amount of rs.5,50,000/-. The petitioner alleges that she went to the office of the Sub-Registrar on 29.10.1999 and complied with the necessary formalities. However, the respondent did not turn up to get the sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner again went to the office of Sub-Registrar on 2.11.1999. However, the respondent did not turn up. Thereafter, the petitioner filed civil suit on 8.5.2001 for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement. Along with the suit an application was filed seeking ad interim injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the suit land to anybody whatsoever and from dispossessing the petitioner from the suit land. The said application was dismissed by the learned trial Court vide order





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top