S. S. Nijjar and j. JJ.

1. The petitioner was appointed in the Haryana Tourism Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation") as a Helper on daily wages in february, 1982. His services were terminated on 30.11.1988. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute which culminated in award on 24.5.1993 (Annexure P-1 ). The Labour Court held that the termination of the services of the petitioner was neither justified nor legal. He was ordered to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back-wages. The State of haryana had formulated a policy for regularisation on 27.5.1993 (Annexure p-7 ). This policy is admittedly applicable to the respondent-Corporation.

2. The claim of the petitioner for regularisation was not considered under the aforesaid policy. He was, however, reinstated in service and allowed to continue on the job. On 5.1.1997, a charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner with the allegation that he came on duty under the influence of liquor and that he behaved rudely with the staff member. The petitioner claims that the charge was totally false as he had always been teetotaler. Aggrieved by the attitude of the respondent-Corporation, the petitioner