SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1427

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Rakesh Kumar Garg – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Garg – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. The landlord has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 7.2.2005, passed by the Appellate Court staying the execution of the impugned judgment and decree of the trial Court during the pendency of the first appeal subject to the conditions that the respondent-tenant shall deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- in the name of the Appellate court in an F.D.R. with an undertaking that in the event of the petitioner being found entitled thereto, he will be entitled to encash the F.D.R. and further to deposit Rs. 7,320/- per month on 10th of every month in the Court from 10.3.2005 till the disposal of the appeal.

2. The petitioner is the landlord of S.C.O. No. 290, Motor Market and Commercial Complex, Mani Majra, Chandigarh. He filed a suit for ejectment as well as suit for recovery of the arrears of rent and future damages after terminating the tenancy on 13.2.2001, before the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Chandigarh. In the suit, the petitioner claimed the arrears of rent as follows:

(a) that the rate of rent of the demised premises was initially Rs. 7,320/- per month, which was subsequently increased as per










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top