SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1399

MEHTAB S.GILL, AJAI LAMBA
Vijender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

MEHTAB S. GILL, J.

1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Additional sessions Judge, Hissar dated 5.11.1996/7.11.1996 whereby he convicted vijender Singh, Satbir alias Minka and Sardul Singh alias Dula under section 302 read with Sections 120-B/34 IPC and sentenced them to undergo various sentences under different sections.

2. The case of the prosecution is unfolded by the statement Ex. PN of Tek Chand given to S. I. Mohinder Singh on 24.5.1994 at 2.15 P. M. in police Station Agroha. Tek Chand has stated that my maternal brother satbir, Galli, Teka and Ved Parkash son of Gulaba, all residents of village dharsul had committed the murder of Baba Maheshpuri in 1991. Tek chand is confined in jail and the other three are on bail. The said case was fixed for today i. e. on 24.5.1994 for evidence in the Court of Shri pritam pal, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hissar. After attending and hearing of the case, Tek Chand and Vedi alias Ved Parkash started for village dharsul on a Rajdoot motor cycle bearing registration No. HYJ/6165. The motor cycle was driven by Vedi and complainant was sitting on the pillion.

3. They had to reach village Dharsul via Agroha. At about 1.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top