SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1392

NIRMAL YADAV
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Yadav, J.

1. Through this petition filed under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, petitioner has prayed for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No. 2 vide order dated 6.9.2003 (Annexure P-9) passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, in a criminal complaint under Sections 420/406/409/120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Petitioner filed a complaint before the trial Court against the accused persons under Sections 420/406/409/120-B IPC of the Indian Penal Code. On appreciation of preliminary evidence adduced by the complainant, the trial Magistrate, vide this order dated 6.7.2000, summoned the accused persons, including respondent No. 2 Mahender Singh for offences punishable under Sections 420/406/409/120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent No. 2 evaded service for more than three years and did not appear before the trial Court. It was only after the non-bailable warrants were issued against the accused persons including respondent No. 2 that they surrendered before the trial Magistrate on 3.5.2003. Respondent No. 2 applied for bail, which was dismissed by the trial Magistrate vide order dated 5.8.2003.

3. Respondent No.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top