SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1359

M.M.KUMAR, T.P.S.MANN
Dharampal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of directions to the respondents to allot to the petitioner a residential plot according to the oustees policy, dated 10-9-1987 (P-1). It is admitted position that the status of the petitioner is that of an oustee as his land measuring 20 Kanals 10 Marlas was acquired on 5-11-1996 for development of Sectors 3 and 7, Sonepat and Award No. 11 was announced. On 18-11-2002, the petitioner applied for allotment of 10 marla size of plot under the oustees policy and deposited Rs. 50,232/-. In support of the claim, the petitioner has placed on record receipt dated 18-11-2002 (P-2). However, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 proceeded with draw of lots in May, 2003 as is evident from para 1 of the preliminary submissions of the reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 2. It is the categorical stand of the petitioner that his application for the allotment of a residential plot was considered in the draw of lots meant for general category which ought to have been considered separately under oustees quota as envisaged by the policy dated 10-9-1987 and 12-3-1993. Aggrieved by the aforementioned action of the respondent
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top