SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 1045

JASBIR SINGH
H. V. P. N. L. – Appellant
Versus
Roop Chand – Respondent


Judgment

1. Vide order, under challenge, objection application of the petitioners, in pending execution application, was dismissed. It is an admitted fact that the judgment and decree, execution of which is pending, have become final. Matter in execution is pending for the last so many years. This Court feels that the order passed by the Court below is perfectly justified as the executing Court except in rarest of the rare cases has no jurisdiction to look into validity or otherwise of the judgment and decree under execution. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. However, as the petitioners, in pursuance to the order dated January 17, 2006, have deposited an amount of Rs.20,34,773/- with the executing Court, this Court is of the view that the attachment of their property deserves to be recalled. The executing court may attach the same again, if amount deposited, does not satisfy the decree, which is pending for execution. It is further made clear that the amount be disbursed to the respondents without imposing any condition what-so-ever, as ordered on January 17, 2006.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top