VINEY MITTAL
Devinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent
1. Defendant Smt. Davinder Kaur having concurrently lost before the two Courts below has approached this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal.
2. The plaintiff Bimla Devi had filed a suit for cancellation of the registered sale deed dated October 20,1993 executed by her in favour of the defendants Smt. Devinder Kaur wife of Tarlochan Singh and Tarlochan Singh himself. Additionally, a relief for possession of the house in question was sought. In the alternative, the plaintiff claimed recovery of Rs.1,85,000/- alongwith interest. It was pleaded by the plaintiff that the sale deed in question had been executed before the Sub Registrar and payment of Rs.1,85,000/- was made through a demand draft. However, on account of relationship between the parties, the defendants after coming out of the office of Sub register took back the aforesaid demand draft with a promise to pay sale consideration within a week. The sale consideration was not paid. In these circumstances, the plaintiff filed a suit.
3. The defendants contested the suit and took a stand that it was the plaintiff who had asked the defendants that since the encashment of the draft would take long time, therefor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.