SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 762

VINEY MITTAL
Devinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent


Judgment

1. Defendant Smt. Davinder Kaur having concurrently lost before the two Courts below has approached this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal.

2. The plaintiff Bimla Devi had filed a suit for cancellation of the registered sale deed dated October 20,1993 executed by her in favour of the defendants Smt. Devinder Kaur wife of Tarlochan Singh and Tarlochan Singh himself. Additionally, a relief for possession of the house in question was sought. In the alternative, the plaintiff claimed recovery of Rs.1,85,000/- alongwith interest. It was pleaded by the plaintiff that the sale deed in question had been executed before the Sub Registrar and payment of Rs.1,85,000/- was made through a demand draft. However, on account of relationship between the parties, the defendants after coming out of the office of Sub register took back the aforesaid demand draft with a promise to pay sale consideration within a week. The sale consideration was not paid. In these circumstances, the plaintiff filed a suit.

3. The defendants contested the suit and took a stand that it was the plaintiff who had asked the defendants that since the encashment of the draft would take long time, therefor


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top