SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 838

KIRAN ANAND LALL
Dropdi – Appellant
Versus
Kanhiya – Respondent


Judgment

Kiran Anand Lall, J.

1. The dispute between the parties pertains to a residential plot comprised of 6 marlas area towards the south-east portion of khasra No. 1566 and 2 marlas area towards the north-east portion of khasra No. 1567. The plaintiff claims to have purchased the plot vide registered sale-deed dated 24.6.1981 for Rs. 2,5007- from Girraj Singh and Hari Raj Singh sons of Raghubir Singh. She also alleged that, in fact, she had been in its continuous, open, and peaceful possession, for the last 13 years, to the knowledge of all. She had paid part of its sale-price also, to the vendors, long back. But, as she was poor, the execution of sale-deed was postponed, and it was agreed that sale-deed would be executed when she was in a position to pay the remaining sale-price. She constructed open chhapper and a room on this plot. On 26.7.1981, the defendants came to her house and wanted to disturb her peaceful possession thereof. They beat her son, and a case was got registered by her, in this regard. Even thereafter, they did not desist from interfering with her possession. Therefore, she filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with her poss









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top