SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 649

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Bhandari General Store – Appellant
Versus
Makhan Singh Grewal – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. This order shall dispose of Civil Revisions No. 5159 and 5350 of 2005, filed by two different tenants against the orders of their ejectment passed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on two separate ejectment applications filed by the same Non-Resident Indian Landlord. Since in both these cases, identical questions of fact and law are involved, therefore, the same are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The respondent-landlord sought ejectment of the petitioners-tenants from shops No. 11 and 6 forming part of the same building i.e. property No.B-XX-732, situated at Gurdev Nagar, Ludhiana, under Section 13-B of the Act, on the ground that he requires the entire building including the shops in question for opening a show room of old and new cars. In the ejectment petitions, it has been pleaded by the respondent that he is a Non-Resident Indian and he has returned to India and requires the demised premises, which are part of one building, for his own use to open the show room. For that purpose, the entire building bearing property No.B-XX-732 is required. He has also plead











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top