SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 491

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.

1. Heard. As prayed for, section 326 IPC is allowed to be added in the heading of the petition and the prayer. Offence alleged is under sections 379/323/324/355/506/341/ 326/148/149 IPC.

2. Case of the prosecution is that on 23.1.2006 at 11.30 A. M. , the petitioners assaulted the complainant. There was rivalry on account of party faction with the truck union. Injury attributed to Avtar Singh has been declared to be grievous.

3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that Avtar Singh is not seeking anticipatory bail and injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple; they are willing to join investigation and cooperate with the investigation and their arrest at this stage is not called for.

4. Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioners will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.

5. In the event of arrest, the petitioners will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top