ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1. Heard. As prayed for, section 326 IPC is allowed to be added in the heading of the petition and the prayer. Offence alleged is under sections 379/323/324/355/506/341/ 326/148/149 IPC.
2. Case of the prosecution is that on 23.1.2006 at 11.30 A. M. , the petitioners assaulted the complainant. There was rivalry on account of party faction with the truck union. Injury attributed to Avtar Singh has been declared to be grievous.
3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that Avtar Singh is not seeking anticipatory bail and injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple; they are willing to join investigation and cooperate with the investigation and their arrest at this stage is not called for.
4. Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioners will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law.
5. In the event of arrest, the petitioners will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.