SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 308

JASBIR SINGH
New India Assurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

Jasbir Singh, J.

1. This application has been moved for condonation of delay of 148 days in filing this appeal. Application is accompanied by an affidavit. Despite many efforts made, service of the respondents is not complete. In view of averments made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, it is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. Vide order under challenge, Commissioner under the workmens Compensation Act, 1923, has granted compensation to the tune of Rs.2,80,350/- along with interest to the widow and minor children, i. e. , the respondents on account of death of Shri Ram Singh. It is apparent from the records that the appellant along with other respondents has failed to lead any evidence to rebut the claim of the respondents. Age of the deceased was only 39 years. He was getting salary of Rs.3,000/- per month. In view of this, compensation awarded is perfectly justified. Counsel for the appellant has contended that the appellant has wrongly been burdened with liability to pay interest on the compensation awarded. However, he has failed to show that there was any negative clause with regard to the payment of interest in the policy.

3. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top