VINEY MITTAL
Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Himta Ram – Respondent
Viney Mittal, J.
1. The vendees are the appellants before this Court who have lost concurrently in a suit for pre-emption filed by the plaintiff-respondent.
2. Plaintiff Himta Ram filed a suit for pre-emption on December 14, 1989 claiming a right of pre-emption with regard to land measuring 32 kanals which had been sold by Smt. Shakuntla Devi, widow of Bahadur Singh, to Krishan Lal and Bhagwan Singh through a registered sale deed dated December 15, 1988 for a consideration of Rs. 1,17,000/-. The plaintiff claimed that 20/32 shares had been sold in favour of defendant No. 1 Krishan Lal, whereas, 12/32 shares had been sold in favour of defendant No. 2 Bhagwan Singh. It was further claimed by the plaintiff that although the actual price was fixed at Rs. 80,000/- but the consideration had been shown as Rs. 1,17,000/-. The plaintiff claimed that he was a co-sharer alongwith Shakuntla Devi in the joint Khata and Khewat and, therefore, had a preferential right to purcahse the land. It was also claimed that the defendants were strangers and had no concern with the suit land and, therefore, the plaintiff had a superior right to purchase the same.
3. The suit was contested by the def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.