SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 17

NIRMAL YADAV
Harinder Gun House – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Yadav, J.

1. The present petition is directed against the order dated 27.4.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patiala, whereby the petitioners application seeking permission to recall the complainant for crossexamination with regard to certain material facts, has been rejected.

2. The facts in brief, are that respondent-Mohinder Kaur filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , against the petitioner alleging that petitioner had issued a cheque bearing No. 509299 dated 7.6.2003 of Oriental Bank of Commerce, Main Bazar, Gurbax Colony, Patiala for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- in favour of the complainant. The complainant deposited the above cheque in her account in the State Bank of Patiala, Model Town, Patiala for its encashment. When the said cheque was presented to the Oriental Bank of Commerce, it was returned vide memo dated 13.6.1003 of State Bank of India with the endorsement "account of the accused (petitioner) has already been closed". The complainant issued a legal notice dated 27.6.2003 through her counsel demanding the amount of cheque from the accused. The notice was duly served on the petitioner. However, the petitio






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top