S.S.SARON
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent
S.S.Saron, J.
1. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the impugned order dated 8.10.2005 passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot, whereby the application filed by the respondent-State Bank of India under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC for short) for amendment of the plaint and under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. for production of additional evidence has been allowed.
2. The plaintiff-respondent State Bank of India (Bank for short) filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,71,565/- from the defendants-petitioners. It was alleged that Des Raj Chawla (defendant No. 1-since deceased and now represented by his LRs) was working as an Accountant with the Bank at Baghapurana during the period from 1987 to 1991. His sons Vijay Kumar (defendant No. 2), Vinod Kumar (defendant No. 4) and defendants No. 6, 7 and 8 were maintaining accounts with the Bank. The defendants conspired amongst themselves to defraud the Bank. They committed fraud to the extent of Rs. 2,06,700/-. The defendants gave various cheques to the plaintiff-Bank at Baghapurana and Des Raj Chawala (since deceased) unauthorisedly purchased the same and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.