SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 1321

S.S.SARON
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Saron, J.

1. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the impugned order dated 8.10.2005 passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot, whereby the application filed by the respondent-State Bank of India under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC for short) for amendment of the plaint and under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. for production of additional evidence has been allowed.

2. The plaintiff-respondent State Bank of India (Bank for short) filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,71,565/- from the defendants-petitioners. It was alleged that Des Raj Chawla (defendant No. 1-since deceased and now represented by his LRs) was working as an Accountant with the Bank at Baghapurana during the period from 1987 to 1991. His sons Vijay Kumar (defendant No. 2), Vinod Kumar (defendant No. 4) and defendants No. 6, 7 and 8 were maintaining accounts with the Bank. The defendants conspired amongst themselves to defraud the Bank. They committed fraud to the extent of Rs. 2,06,700/-. The defendants gave various cheques to the plaintiff-Bank at Baghapurana and Des Raj Chawala (since deceased) unauthorisedly purchased the same and














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top