SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 1281

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Ram Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Initially this petition was filed by petitioner Ram Lal under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the respondents to award compensation to him on account of the illegal arrest and detention of his son. The said petition was subsequently ordered to be treated as a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and has been numbered as Crl. Misc. No. 16357-M of 2005.

2. The brief facts of the case are that one Surinder Singh son of Ramdeen, Caste Khatiq, resident of H.No. 1488, Anaj Mandi, Jagadhari, was an accused in case FIR No. 673 dated 3.12.1999 registered at Police Station Ambala Cantt under Sections 61/1/14 of the Excise Act. In the said case, he was on bail. Later on, he was declared as Proclaimed Offender on 14.2.2003 by the Court of JMIC, Ambala Cantt.

3. In the year 2001, a special team was constituted under the direction of the Government to nab the Proclaimed Offenders who have jumped the bail. On 22.6.2004, on a secret information, son of the petitioner namely, Surender Kumar, who is Harijan by caste and was resident of village Nalagarh/Khera Farm, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamunanagar, and who was not an accuse














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top