SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 1102

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, S.N.AGGARWAL
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory – Respondent


Judgment

J.S.Khehar, J.

1. Shop-cum-Office Site No. 21, Sector 33-D, Chandigarh was resumed by an order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer dated 26.11.1997 (Annexure P-1) on account of non-payment of installments. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer which was disposed of by the Appellate Authority namely Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh exercising the powers of Chief Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh by an order dated 29.11.2000, by taking a lenient view, and by directing the appellant i.e. the petitioner, herein, to clear the entire amount of arrears along with interest and ground rent etc. by 31.3.2001. The petitioner having not been able to clear the dues in terms of the order passed by the Appellate Authority preferred a Revision Petition. The Revisional Authority namely, the Advisor to the Administrator, U.T,. Chandigarh, dismissed the said Revision Petition on 3.12.2003. Against the afore-stated order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer, the Appellate Authority as well as the Revisional Authority, the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition.

2. Profiteering from a citizen can never be th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top