JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, S.N.AGGARWAL
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory – Respondent
J.S.Khehar, J.
1. Shop-cum-Office Site No. 21, Sector 33-D, Chandigarh was resumed by an order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer dated 26.11.1997 (Annexure P-1) on account of non-payment of installments. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer which was disposed of by the Appellate Authority namely Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh exercising the powers of Chief Administrator, U.T. Chandigarh by an order dated 29.11.2000, by taking a lenient view, and by directing the appellant i.e. the petitioner, herein, to clear the entire amount of arrears along with interest and ground rent etc. by 31.3.2001. The petitioner having not been able to clear the dues in terms of the order passed by the Appellate Authority preferred a Revision Petition. The Revisional Authority namely, the Advisor to the Administrator, U.T,. Chandigarh, dismissed the said Revision Petition on 3.12.2003. Against the afore-stated order passed by the Assistant Estate Officer, the Appellate Authority as well as the Revisional Authority, the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition.
2. Profiteering from a citizen can never be th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.