SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 1045

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
H.S.Bedi and Viney Mittal JJ.
Harbhagwant Singh Dhillon
Versus
Haryana Roadways
Letter Patent Appeal No. 11 of 1994,
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 28, 2005

The entire amount of the claimant's salary was to be considered while determining the loss of income in a motor accident case, and interest at 12% per annum was granted on the enhanced amount from the date of the filing of the claim petition.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident Case - The court enhanced the compensation amount by considering the entire salary of the claimant and awarded interest at 12% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.

Fact of the Case:

The claimant, a Joint Assistant Director General in the C.R.P.F., suffered amputation of his right arm in a motor accident. He filed a claim petition seeking Rs. 7.00 lacs as compensation. The Tribunal assessed the compensation at Rs. 2,18,416/-, which was enhanced by the learned Single Judge to Rs. 3,19,460/- plus 12% interest per annum.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the reduction in the amount of the claimant's salary was unjustified and considered the entire amount of salary while determining the loss of income. The court also affirmed the other sums awarded to the claimant and granted interest at 12% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of the filing of the claim petition.

Issues: The only issue was the quantum of compensation, as the claimant appealed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in a motor accident case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the entire amount of the claimant's salary was to be taken into consideration while determining the loss of income, and affirmed the other sums awarded to the claimant. Additionally, the court granted interest at 12% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of the filing of the claim petition.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the court computed the loss of income at Rs. 4,80,000/- and affirmed the other sums awarded to the claimant. The appellant was also entitled to interest at 12% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of the filing of the claim petition.

Judgment

H.S.Bedi, J.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in a motor accident case, whereby a sum of Rs. 3,19,460/- plus 12% interest per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition has been allowed, vide judgment dated 6.4.1993. As only the claimant has filed an appeal, the only issue that arises is with regard to the quantum of compensation. The claimant Harbhagwant Singh Dhillon was a Joint Assistant Director General in the C.R.P.F., Directorate, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. In the accident. In question, his right arm suffered amputation. He filed a claim petition claiming Rs.7.00 lacs as compensation. The Tribunal assessed the compensation at Rs. 2,18,416/-. The figure has been enhanced by the learned Single Judge vide the impugned judgment. The learned Single Judge, in-ter-alia, observed that as the claimant had been drawing a salary of Rs. 2579/- per month, the loss of income was to be assessed at Rs. 1500/- per month for 16 years, moving the total figure to Rs. 2,88,000/-.

2. We have heard Mr. Maharaj Bakhsh, the learned counsel for the appellant-claimant. We find that as the claimant himself is the appellant before us, the question of reduction in the amount of the salary from Rs. 2579/- per month to Rs. 1500/- was clearly unjustified. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the entire amount of salary was to be taken into consideration while determining the loss of income, more particularly when the learned Single Judge, had not thought it fit to award any further amount towards appellants retiral benefits as he was only 39 years of age at the time of the accident.

3. We accordingly compute the loss of income as under: Rs. 2500 X 12 X 6 = Rs. 4,80,000/-

4. The other sums awarded to the claimant are also affirmed. The appellant will also be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of the filing of the claim petition.

5. The appeal is allowed in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top