SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 995

M.M.KUMAR
Shamsher – Appellant
Versus
Anurag Aggarwal – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for brevity `the Act), is a classical illustration of obstructing and impeding the Administration of Justice. The grievance made by the petitioner is that the undertaking dated 5.8.2003 based on the statement made by the respondents through the State counsel was false. It is appropriate to mention that on the basis of the statement Civil Writ Petition No. 11144 of 2003, filed by the petitioner was disposed of and the Division Bench has issued directions to respondents. As a consequence the petitioner has suffered an irreparable loss and a prayer has been made for punishing the respondents in accordance with law.

2. Facts in brief are that Smt. Channo Devi was functioning as a Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Ferozepur, District Kaithal. There were serious allegations, inter alia, of misappropriation against her. Respondent No. 2 Shri Chand Ram, the then Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Guhla, had made an assessment report of the development works executed by the Sarpanch. A preliminary enquiry was conducted and prima facie allegations were proved against her. On 19.12.2002,




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top