SURYA KANT
Roshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Surya Kant, J.
1. This criminal revision petition has been directed against the judgment and order dated 16.8.1990, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar, holding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 304-A IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 9 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default thereof, to undergo further RI for one month, as well as against the judgment dated 12.5.1992, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar, whereby his appeal against the aforementioned conviction and sentence was also dismissed.
2. This criminal revision petition came up for hearing on 2.6.1992 and while admitting the same, the petitioner was admitted to bail to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar.
3. As per the prosecution case, Swaran Singh son of Karora Singh Saini, resident of Hazara Jhakhian, informed the police on 27.6.1988 at about 11 a.m., that he along with Bachan Singh son of Uttam Singh of his village (since deceased) was going to Kiratpur Sahib. Bachan Singh was on his cycle and was about 20 yards ahead of him and the complainant was following the deceased on his cycle. When they reached near bus stand Bunga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.