SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 866

SURYA KANT
Roshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Surya Kant, J.

1. This criminal revision petition has been directed against the judgment and order dated 16.8.1990, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar, holding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 304-A IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 9 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default thereof, to undergo further RI for one month, as well as against the judgment dated 12.5.1992, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar, whereby his appeal against the aforementioned conviction and sentence was also dismissed.

2. This criminal revision petition came up for hearing on 2.6.1992 and while admitting the same, the petitioner was admitted to bail to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar.

3. As per the prosecution case, Swaran Singh son of Karora Singh Saini, resident of Hazara Jhakhian, informed the police on 27.6.1988 at about 11 a.m., that he along with Bachan Singh son of Uttam Singh of his village (since deceased) was going to Kiratpur Sahib. Bachan Singh was on his cycle and was about 20 yards ahead of him and the complainant was following the deceased on his cycle. When they reached near bus stand Bunga





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top