PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
N.K.Sud and Virender Singh JJ.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ Petition No. 775 of 2005,
Decided On : AUGUST 23, 2005
No Objection Certificate - Violation of Rule 150 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 - The court quashed the order withdrawing the 'No Objection Certificate' as it was passed in violation of Rule 150 of the Rules and the principles of equity and natural justice.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was granted a 'No Objection Certificate' for installation of a retail outlet, but it was subsequently withdrawn without granting the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the withdrawal of the 'No Objection Certificate' was in violation of Rule 150 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 and the principles of equity and natural justice.
Issues: Violation of Rule 150 of the Rules and principles of equity and natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once a 'No Objection Certificate' is granted, it cannot be withdrawn or suspended without following the procedure outlined in Rule 150, which includes giving the licensee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order withdrawing the 'No Objection Certificate' and allowed the writ petition in favor of the petitioner.
N.K.Sud, J.
1. Petitioner was granted "No Objection, Certificate" for installation of retail outlet on Hambran Road, Ludhiana Under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 (for short the Rules) by the Additional District Magistrate on 27 7.2004. A copy of the "No Objection Certificate" has been placed as Annexure P/14. Subsequently, vide order dated 3.1.2005, the Additional District Magistrate, Ldhiana has informed the petitioner that in vie of the orders of District Magistrate, Ludhiana dated 31 12 2004 and condition No. 9 of the "No Objection Certificate", "No Objection Certificate" dated 2 8.2004 is withdrawn The petitioner has challenged the said order in the present writ petition on the ground that the impugned order withdrawing, the "No Objection Certificate" has been passed in utter violation of Rule 150 of the Rules and in violation of principles of equity and natural justice, as no opportunity of being heard was granted to it before the impugned order was passed Counsel for the petitioner has also pointed out that the petitioner has not even supplied the copy of the. order of{ District Magistrate, I Ludhiana dated 31 12 2004, on the basis of which the impugned order has been passed.
2. The learned Additional Advocate General, Pun|ab appearing on behalf of respondent Nos 1 to 3 has not been able to controvert the contention of the petitioner that no opportunity whatsoever had been granted to it by the District Magistrate or the Additional District Magistrate, Ludhiana before passing the impugned older dated 3.1.2005.
3. Mr. M.L. Sarin, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5 contended that even if the principles of natural justice have been violated, it is not a fit case for interference by this. Court in its jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution as setting aside of the impugned order would result in restoration of another illegal order i.e. the "No Objection Certificate" which had been granted without following the procedure.
4. In support of his contentions, he placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in M.C.Mehta v. Union of lndia and Ors. A.I.R l999 S.C. 2583 and judgment of this Court in All India LPG Distributors Federation(North-West Region) v. Union of India and Ors. (2002-1)130 P.L.R. 815.
5. We have heard counsel for1 the parties and perused relevant rules. Once an application is made for grant of "No Objection Certificate", the authorities have the power to grant or to refuse it but once it is granted, it cannot be withdrawn or suspended. It can only be cancelled Under Rule 150 of the Rules, which read as:-
.
"150. Cancellation of No Objection Certificate.- (1) A no objection certificate granted Under Rule 144 shall be liable to be cancelled by the District Authority of the State Government, if the District Authority or the State Government is satisfied, that the licensee has ceased to have any right to use the site for storing petroleum. Provided that before cancelling a no objection certificate, the licensee shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
(2) A District Authority or a State Government cancelling a no objection certificate shall record, in writing, the reasons for such cancellation and:
shall immediately furnish to the licensee and to the licensing authority concerned, copy of the order cancelling the ho objection certificate".
6 A plain reading of the proviso of Subrule (1) of Rule 150 of the Rules provides that before cancelling a "No Objection Certificate", the licensee shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This has admittedly not been done in the present case. We also agree with the counsel for the petitioner that by not supplying a copy,of order dated 31.12.2004, which is the basis of the impugned order, the petitioner has been denied an opportunity of being heard. .
7. In the present case, the petitioner had been granted "No Objection Certificate", by the District Magistrate, Ludhiana and has thereafter i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.