SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 856

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, VINEY MITTAL
Haryana Public Service Commission Through Controller Of Examination – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Viney Mittal, J.

1. Through the present petition, an unfortunate attempt has been made by the Haryana Public Service Commission ( hereinafter called the "Commission") to thwart the efforts made by the State Government to find out as to whether in some of the past selections made by the Commission, its Officers and Officials, its Secretary, its Members and the past Chairman etc. had acted on some extraneous and illegal consideration. The Commission complains that holding of the aforesaid Vigilance inquiries and summoning of the record of the aforesaid previous selections by the Vigilance Department was, in fact, an encroachment upon the independence and the constitutional status of the Commission.

2. It has been averred by the Commission that general elections to the State assembly were held in the State of Haryana in February/March, 2005. As a result of the same "Congress Government" was formed in the State. Although, it has hastened to add that the present Chairman and the members are non-political persons. It has been averred that the present Chairman and the present members of the Commission are the appointees of the previous "Indian National Lok Dal" Government. It has

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top