SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 652

AJAY K.MITTAL
Poonam Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Jagjit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is an appeal by the wife under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against the judgment and decree dated 26-8-1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, whereby petition of the respondent-husband for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(1-a) of the Act on the ground of cruelty had been allowed.

2. This is rather an unfortunate case where matrimonial alliance between the parties settled by way of an advertisement in the newspaper, though made a good start but ran into rough weather just within a period of less than two years thereafter. The budding couple, soon after the marriage, which was solemnised on 9-8-1992 at Chandigarh as per Sikh rites through Anand Karaj in the presence of respectables and relatives of the parties, entertained high hopes and aspirations and they were not only hoping but were anxiously looking forward to a life full of mirth and merriment, mutual love and devotion. They were even blessed with a daughter, named Jaspreet Kaur on 29-4-1993. But the circumstances took an ugly turn and dragged the couple to the door of the Court, initiation, however





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top