SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 661

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Vinod Krishna Kaul – Appellant
Versus
S. A. Khan – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Petitioner Shri Vinod Krishna Kaul, who retired from the post of Director General. Bureau of Police Research and Development, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi, has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the summoning order dated 14.5.1992 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar as well as the complaint (Annexure P-17) filed by the respondent against him under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. On 2.7.1990, the respondent filed a complaint against the petitioner alleging therein that when the respondent was posted as Deputy Director (Training), Bureau of Police Research and Development, New Delhi, the petitioner who was his senior officer, made some personal adverse remarks against the respondent and his family members. When the respondent requested the petitioner not to make such remarks, he started having the grudge against him. It was further alleged that on 14.11.1987. The respondent travelled in his own car from Delhi to Chandigarh along with his wife and son and he submitted that T.A. bills in this regard. The petitioner instead
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top