SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 526

HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Lachmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Gurcharan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Harjit Singh Bedi, J.

1. This petition is directed against the order of the Executing Court dated 18.3.1993, whereby the objections filed against the judgment of the Rent Controller dated 12.8.1985 ordering ejectment, have been dismissed.

2. The facts of the case are indeed somewhat startling and betray the petitioner(s) in a most unbecoming manner, as they have managed to delay the execution proceedings for over twenty years. The property in question is situated in Hoshiarpur in the State of Punjab. One Parduman Singh, who was the owner of 10 marlas of land, sold approximately 6 marlas to Gurcharan Singh, vide registered sale-deed dated 12.8.1977. As the property had been partly built upon, it had been allocated Municipal House No. 385. Admittedly, Joginder Pal son of Lachmi Devi petitioner was a tenant in some portion of this property. Gurcharan Singh thereafter filed an application for ejectment against Joginder Pal, which was allowed on 12.8.1985. The appeal filed by Joginder Pal and Civil Revision No. 1243 of 1986 before this Court too were dismissed and the order of ejectment was maintained. It also appears that Lachhmi Devi and her three sons, which included Joginder























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top