SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 457

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
Gurbaksh Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

1. The plaintiff/appellant (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) has filed the present Regular Second Appeal against the judgment dated 11.10.1999 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Hoshiarpur, as well as the judgment of the District Judge, Hoshiarpur, dated 13.1.2000 by which the suit for possession of the shop in dispute filed by the plaintiff was dismissed.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the plaintiff was the owner of the shop in dispute which is situated in village Kot Fatuhi, District Hoshiarpur, and the same was given on monthly rent to the defendant/respondent (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) at the rate of Rs.200/- per month. The plaintiff issued a legal notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) through her counsel Shri Jawala Singh Dhammi to the respondent by which the lease of the shop in question was terminated. It is pertinent to mention here that the appellant was also the owner of two other shops in which similar notices had been issued to the tenants of those shops. Legal notice issued under Section 106 of the Act was duly received by the respondent and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top