SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 211

AMAR DUTT
Satyender Panwar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Amar Dutt, J.

1. The petitioners seek the quashing of FIR No. 274 dated 8.5.1998 registered under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC in Police Station Sector-5, Panchkula. The marriage of Satyertder Panwar who is an Assistant Commandant in Border Security Force was solemnised with Smt. Neetu, Respondent No. 2 on 12.4.1997 but owing to difference of temperament and ideology the couple could not pull on together and stared living apart with the result FIR No. 274 dated 8.5.1998 was registered in Police Station Sector-5 Panchkula at the behest of Respondent No. 2. The petitioners claim that the investigation has been completed and all articles of gifts and Istridhan have been returned to respondent No. 2 who has also been given Rs. 4.70 lacs with the intervention of friends and relatives. The parties are stated to have effected a compromise and their marriage has been dissolved through a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 3.1.2000. In view of this as the petitioners have resolved all their disputes and according to the compromise Respondent No. 2 was required not to press the case which was registered at her behest, it is prayed that FIR No. 274 dated 8.5.1998 be quashed.

2. After




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top