SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 279

R.L.ANAND
Gram Panchayat, Kanehi, Gurgaon – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

R. L. Anand, J.

1. This judgment disposes of RFA No.666 of 1997 and also the application under Order 41 Rule 27 C. P. C. filed by the appellant.

2. This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated 24.1.1997, passed by the additional District Judge, Gurgaon, who apportioned the compensation vis-a-vis the appellants and respondents No.1 and 2 and it was held that respondents No.1 and 2 are entitled to get 3/4th share of the compensation while Gram Panchayat-appellant is entitled to get the remaining l/4th share of the compensation.

3. The facts of the case are as follows: A reference under Sec.30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 , was moved by Ram Rikh, tej Ram, Pirbhu, Bhagwana, Bhule and Ganga sahai, against the Gram Panchayat Kanehi and others. Pursuant to Notification No. AC (G)90/211 dated 20.4.1990, published in the haryana Govt. Gazette (Extra Ordinary) on the same day under Sec.4 of the Act, followed by Notification No. LAC-G-91/ntla/278 dated 18.4.1991, issued under Sec.6 of the Act, land measuring 1068.64 acres of village Jharsa Kanehi, Bindapur and Samaspur, was acquired by the Government of Haryana for public puposes. Award No.8 of the year 1992-93 was gi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top