SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 1324

S.S.NIJJAR
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.Nijjar, J.

1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of the FIR No. 264 dated 13.6.2000 under Sections 420/406/465/468/474 IPC at Police Station Kotwali, Bathinda and the proceedings consequential thereon.

2. According to the FIR, the complainant was serving in the AIR Force. After 20 years of service, he has been discharged on 17.4.2000. The complainant approached the petitioner for purchase of a car. Kuldeep Singh introduced the complainant to the vendor of the car. The deal was struck at Rs. 1,08,000/-. Balance amount of Rs. 58000/- alongwith the commission of Rs. 1500/- was to be paid to the petitioner on 20.5.2000. The possession of the car was, however, not delivered to the complainant. Therefore, he registered the FIR on the allegations that the petitioner had not passed on the money to the actual owner. Thereafter, the petitioner applied for bail. This application for bail was heard and decided by the learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda. In his order dated 27.6.2000, the learned Sessions Judge has observed that the complainant is present in Court and he submitted that he has already got the car and the relevant papers. It was also stated that the co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top