SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 252

SWATANTER KUMAR
Piara Singh And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Kumar And Anr. – Respondent


Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. Challenge in this revision is to the order dated 29.11.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib. The facts relevant for the determination of the controversy in issue in this revision are that the plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction alleging themselves to be the heirs of Karam Singh and also claimed interest in the suit property on the basis of a will in their favour by the deceased, to the exclusion of his real brother Pritam Singh.

2. The suit was contested by the defendants. The learned trial Court vide the judgment and decree in the year 1995, dismissed the suit. The unsuccessful plaintiffs filed an appeal before the learned first appellate Court. During the pendency of the appeal an application was filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of Civil Procedure Code on 27.10.1999 and also filed an application under Order 14 Rule 5 of the Code for framing of additional issues. Both these applications were dismissed by the learned first Appellate Court vide its order dated 29.11.1999.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that in this revision the petitioners are primarily challenging the dism







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top